By:
Maaz Mohammed A.Q
Ccels Learning Associates
Bengaluru
One evening I was passing through the road, I saw six cows
sitting together on a bridge. The cows were sitting so close to each other in a
group as if some close friends are sitting together. It was a very great sight
to look at and admire. My question is, do the cows know that they are sitting
in a group of their own species. Do the cows know that they have learnt to live
in a community, as we can see them in current position of sitting together? Do cows
understand the implications of socialization? Did the cows acquire the social
skills by observing their other counterparts or it is genetically acquired?
Let us discuss the socialization of human beings. Currently
in modern education curriculum it is highly advocated that the social
development should be part of any curriculum. Some of the psychologists such as
Vygotsky have contributed much on child development. Vygotsky believed that
humans share some elementary psychological processes with animals, including
basic attentional, perceptual, and memory processes. Within the framework
provided by the culture as a whole, parents, teachers, and other care givers
select and organise activities and social interactions that they deem
appropriate for children (siegler & Alibali, N.D) . By looking at the
sight of this cows one will easily question, even though they do not go to
school how they have learnt to live together. Do they have innate
characteristics of socialization? To extend our example a little, we also see
the relationship the dogs have maintained with humans from generations. By all this,
could we also believe that humans have innate capacity to socialize and live in
the social life to its fullest?
Further insights into cognitive abilities required for
learning from social interaction have been gained from comparative studies of
children (siegler & Alibali, N.D) . Perhaps the most
basic cognitive ability needed for social and cultural learning is the ability
to establish intersubjectivity, which
is shared understanding between people that emerges through processes of mutual
attention and communication. The capacity for intersubjectivity emerges at an
early age for human beings (siegler & Alibali, N.D) . That is why there
is so much emphasis on social development in national curriculums of many
nations. Further, if we analyse cognition required for social development we
can see how animals have this kind of development without any training and
conditioning. This opens upon a question, does our children really need a
special emphasis on social development at schools, home and community.
Let us try to understand this. The conditions and the world
in which humans live is complex compared to the animal world. The humans have
to continuously deal with non-verbal as well as verbal language. This requires
humans to learn the various transactional skills to deal with various behaviours
and stimuli- at school, at home and with larger community. What implications
does the schools have for this? The child spends equal part of waking time at
school, as much as the time spent at home. And very importantly the children
are the part of citizenry who will play an important role in the democratic
machinery. (Dewey, 1900) as quoted by (Batra, 2011)
viewed schools as miniature societies that could enable the cultivation of a
democratic social order.
There are various approaches which view children
differently- children as empty minds, children who have innate knowledge, or
children have knowledge, but environment has to be created to learn. What role
does school and the teacher play in the socialization process. The traditional
view is that an effective teacher is one who can ‘control’ children by keeping
them silent and attentive in class. The idea of control manifests in the
popular conception of education which is to ‘socialise’ children in ‘desirable
ways’ of ‘sitting’ in a formal class, ‘behaving’ in school and ‘following
instructions’ from the teacher. All this is towards the larger aim of building
character and morals as the most important goal of education (Batra, 2011) . But progressive
thinking is that the teacher should play a role of facilitator rather than a
role of ‘I know it all’. The class room practices, playground, and friends play
an important role in social skills development. The children should learn
sympathy, empathy, patience, coping skills, learn to be non-judgemental, maintain
healthy relationship, and care for larger community through active citizenship.
As discussed in earlier part of article, the humans develop capacity of social
development at early age. Thus this have implications for schools, particularly
pre-school to develop the agendas to develop these skills- through curriculum,
pedagogy, syllabus, co-curricular activities and like.
According to Michael Tomasello, and his collaborators, only
humans are capable of certain, more advanced forms of social learning that
require understanding of others as individuals with intentions and goals.
According to this view, what is crucial in learning from social interaction is
humans’ ability to understand other people as being like themselves, and in
particular, as having intentions and mental states like their own (siegler &
Alibali, N.D) .
Do animals also understand their counterparts that they are also like them?
In this article we have discussed about children who go to
school, but there is also other part of population who are not part of school.
There are children who are child labourers, who are out of school due to
disability, children at juvenile centres and so on. What are the policies and
procedures the society, and particularly the bureaucracy has to take, to foster
the overall development of these children as well?
References
Batra, P. (2011).
Teacher Education and Classroom Practice in India: A Critique and
Propositions (This Review Paper is based on the presentation made at
epiSTEME-4 Conference, 5-9 January 2011. ).
siegler, R.,
& Alibali, M. W. (N.D). Sociocultural theories of development. In Children's
Thinking.
Comments
Post a Comment